Founder’s Notes: It Could All Crumble

Welcome to Founder's Notes—a casual space where I share updates, reflections, and behind-the-scenes moments from Innovative School of Health. These posts aren't meant to be formal; they're meant to be honest, human, and informative, giving you a clearer look at what's happening beyond the desk.

Lately, my calendar has felt like a hostile work environment in its own right. Some days it looks like a game of Tetris designed by someone who hates joy—enrollment, training, marketing, putting out fires (the real ones, the metaphorical ones, and the emotional ones) all crammed into the same blocks of time. When you live like that long enough, chaos starts to feel “normal,” and that’s exactly the mindset that turns staffing and training into a crisis instead of a system.

Inside a lot of facilities, you’ll find one person quietly carrying 70% of the weight and saying, “No no, I’m good,” while they eat crackers over the sink at 4 p.m. and call it lunch. I talk to leaders running entire operations on “three and a half humans and a prayer”—one full-time staff member, one part-time helper, one cousin who shows up on weekends, and a group chat trying to hold it all together. It can be funny to describe, but there’s nothing cute about being stretched that thin. Being overloaded isn’t a personality trait; it’s a warning light.

Where this really shows up is in how training gets handled. On the ground, local facilities know exactly what they need: more trained people, on a timeline that matches reality, not a slide deck. But too often, corporate home offices want to control every approval, every budget, every timeline, and every priority from far away. Someone at the facility is saying, “We need people trained now,” and the answer they get back is, “Circle back after six meetings and a spreadsheet.” Care does not pause while paperwork catches up, and residents don’t stop needing support because a decision three states away is still “under review.”

“Decent” care should be the floor, not the dream—but when training is choked off, even decent starts to feel like a luxury item. Training is not an extra; it is the pipeline. It’s how you get safer, steadier, more confident staff who can actually stay in the work without burning out. When you limit a facility’s ability to train, you are starving the system on purpose and then acting surprised when it collapses under the weight.

I see this play out in conversations with executive directors. Some feel very polished and transactional; every answer sounds like it could survive legal review—smooth, safe, and empty. Others are raw and real within two minutes. They’ll tell you, “I need staff. I need flexibility. I need someone to trust that I know what this building needs.” I’ll take that kind of honesty over a laminated talking point any day, because it means we’re actually talking like humans, not brand statements.

To be clear, corporate support isn’t automatically bad. The problem is control without context. If the home office holds the money and the power but doesn’t trust the people who hold the reality, everybody loses. Support is only support if it actually helps the work move. If it slows training, delays hiring, or limits how a facility can build its own staff pipeline, it’s not support—it’s supervision dressed up as help. Meanwhile, the same system that’s tightening the reins is also asking, “Why are you struggling to maintain quality?” while you’re standing there with one hand tied behind your back filling out forms explaining why it’s hard to maintain quality with one hand tied behind your back.

You don’t need a business degree to understand what happens next. Not enough people plus not enough training equals a room full of stress. The worker feels it, the director feels it, residents feel it, families feel it—everybody in the building knows when the margin for error is too thin. Systems fail when they forget there’s a human being on the other side of every policy, every form, and every delayed approval. I’ve seen that personally and professionally, enough to know that once a process matters more than a person, quality is already in trouble.

If I had to summarize the real goal, it wouldn’t be “the most color‑coded calendar” or “the most emails answered in a day.” The real luxury in this work isn’t being the busiest person in the room; it’s having enough people and enough trust to do the work right. Here at ISH, we have the right team—we just don’t have enough people in a few key areas yet. That’s the tension I live in as a founder and as an ED: honoring the reality on the ground while pushing for the resources and autonomy our people and students deserve.

Because at the end of the day, “busy” doesn’t care for people. People do. My job is to keep fighting for a version of this work where our teams are trained, supported, and trusted—not just booked and burned out.

Thanks for taking the time to read. As always, your feedback is welcome, and I appreciate you being part of the Innovative School of Health community.

—

ED,

Tyrone W.